Al-Sisi, filho de uma judia

The Greater Israel Project – a long-standing Zionist scheme to steal all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates – is halfway there.
They just stole the Nile.
The problem is not that Egypt’s new thug-in-chief, General Abd al-Fattah al-Sisi, is a Jew. (His mother, Malikah Titani, is a Moroccan Jew from Asefi, which makes al-Sisi a Jew and an automatic citizen of Israel.)
If the Egyptian people want to elect a Jew president in a free and fair election – like they elected the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) to the Lower House with 73% of the vote, the Upper House with 80% of the vote, the presidency with 52% of the vote, and approved the MB Constitution with 64% of the vote – that’s fine with me.
The problem is that al-Sisi has concealed his Jewish identity and Israeli connections from the Egyptian people…and destroyed their nascent democracy through deception and mass murder.
An even bigger problem: al-Sisi is almost certainly a Mossad agent. That means al-Sisi’s Egypt is not just a brutal, banana-republic-style dictatorship. It is Israeli-occupied territory: The newest and largest province of ever-expanding Greater Israel.
No wonder the Israeli ambassador called al-Sisi “a national hero for all Jews.”
Al-Sisi’s uncle, Uri Sibagh (sometimes spelled as Sabbagh) served in the Jewish Defense League (Hamagein) from 1948 to 1950, made his aliyah to Israel, and became a bigwig in Ben Gurion’s political party, serving as the secretary of the Israeli Labor Party in Beersheba from 1968 to 1981. Uri’s sister – al-Sisi’s mother – presumably emigrated to Egypt on a mission from the Mossad. That mission culminated when the Mossad overthrew President Morsi and installed its agent al-Sisi in the coup d’état of July 3rd, 2013.
The implication: Al-Sisi has been a lifelong Mossad agent. His mission: infiltrate the highest levels of power in an Arab Muslim country. Al-Sisi is today’s version of Elie Cohen, who infiltrated the highest levels of power in Syria under the name Kamal Amin Thabet before he was exposed and hanged in the public square in Damascus.

George H.W. Bush’s famous line, “If the people knew the truth, they would chase us down the street and lynch us” applies – in spades – to al-Sisi.
It has been widely reported in the mainstream media, as well as by more reliable sources, that al-Sisi has long served as the Egyptian military’s liason with Israel. During the coup d’état of July 3rd, al-Sisi was in permanent liason by telephone with the Israeli and American militaries. (Israel promised its full support, and guaranteed that US aid would not be cut off, while the US waffled.)
The Egyptian coup, especially its propaganda component, had all the earmarks of an Israeli black op. A massively financed campaign run through Egypt’s Israeli-linked mainstream media (yes, the same folks own big media there as here) repeatedly compared President Morsi to Adolf Hitler! The fact that “Morsi = Hitler” was the number one talking point of the forces behind the coup reveals that those forces were Zionists, not Egyptians. Apparently the Zionists couldn’t stop themselves from making reflexive Dr. Strangelove-style anti-Hitler salutes while they were orchestrating the al-Sisi coup – thereby giving their game away.
Since the coup, Israel has been lavishing praise, money, and support on al-Sisi.  Mossad agent al-Sisi has virtually declared war on Palestine by going all-out to close the Gaza border tunnels that keep the people of Gaza alive. Meanwhile, al-Sisi has taken billions of dollars from the Rothschild puppets and likely donmeh crypto-Jews who call themselves the “House of Saud.”
Obviously the Zionist-dominated West and its Middle Eastern puppets will not allow Muslims to elect relatively honest leaders in free elections. Instead, they will use deception and violence to pursue their schemes for regional and global domination.
The Egyptian people – who elected the Muslim Brotherhood by a greater landslide than any US political party has won in all of American history – need a real Islamic revolution to create a genuine democracy. Without it, Egypt will indefinitely remain “a boot stamping on a human face – forever”…and a permanent province of Greater Israel, ruled by a Jewish-Zionist thug who has appointed himself pharaoh, while hiding his real background and loyalties.

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=269043

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners and technicians. Legal Notice

Um novo Estado da Palestina?

The Palestinian Authority and Egypt on Monday strongly denied a report that claimed that Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi had offered PA President Mahmoud Abbas land in Sinai for a Palestinian state.

Israeli politicians, however, welcomed the reported offer.

Army Radio reported that the offer provided a 1,600 square kilometer area near the Gaza Strip, an area that would make the Strip five times its size.

The new territory, composed of Gaza together with the extra land in Sinai, would be a demilitarized state that would serve as a home to which Palestinian refugees would return, Army Radio said.

In addition to the “greater Gaza state,” the Palestinian cities in the West Bank would be under the autonomous rule of the PA, the report added. In exchange, Abbas would give up claims to a state within the pre-1967 lines.

Army Radio said that Sisi tried to appeal to Abbas to accept the offer, arguing that at his age (80), if he does not take this offer, those who come after him will take it.

It said that Abbas was not convinced and rejected the offer.

The report about the Egyptian offer first appeared in a number of Arab media outlets two weeks ago and was then denied by both the PA and Egypt.

On Monday, Nabil Abu Rudaineh, spokesman for the PA presidency, again denied the report, saying Sisi had never made such an offer.

Abu Rudaineh said that the idea of expanding the Gaza Strip toward Sinai was completely unacceptable to the Palestinians, Egyptians and Arabs.

Tayeb Abdel Rahim, a senior aid to Abbas, also denied the report, dubbing it a “fabrication.”

Abdel Rahim noted that this was an old idea that had been proposed by former national security adviser Giora Eiland.

The Palestinian official accused the Israeli media of publishing “fabricated stories” in order to distort the positions of the Palestinians and Egyptians.

A spokesman for the Egyptian Foreign Ministry said that the report was “completely baseless and untrue.”

Israeli politicians, meanwhile, responded enthusiastically to the report.

Science, Technology and Space Minister Yaakov Peri, a former Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) chief, said he’s surprised by Sisi’s generosity, calling the reported proposal “worth discussing seriously.”

He added: “This could solve problems that weren’t given a response in talks between Israel and the Palestinians so far.”

Peri also pointed out that Sisi’s “proposal” suits Egyptian interests, since there are problems with terrorism in Sinai.

Bayit Yehudi faction chairwoman Ayelet Shaked said that the Egyptian president “discerned what the Israeli Left has refused to understand” for decades: “The solution to the Palestinian problem must be regional and cannot fall on Israel’s shoulders alone.”

She called on Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to meet with Sisi and examine whether the reported initiative is possible.

According to coalition chairman Yariv Levin, Sisi’s reported plan is a “very generous offer,” but Abbas’s reported rejection of it proves that Palestinians “refuse to accept Israel’s existence,” he told Army Radio.

Scotland or not Scotland

Royal Bank of Scotland has confirmed it will relocate its registered headquarters to London if Scotland votes for independence next week.

The bank said in a statement that it believed it would be "necessary to re-domicile the bank's holding company".

In a letter to staff, the bank's chief executive said there was no intention to move operations or jobs.

Meanwhile, Scotland's largest fund manager's boss said an independent Scotland would be a huge success.

Martin Gilbert, chief executive of Aberdeen Asset Management said: "I think an independent Scotland would be a big success, but it is a secret ballot and I will abide by that.

"Most sensible people now accept that Scotland would be prosperous with either outcome in the current constitutional debate."

Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond told BBC Scotland he had been given a letter which was sent to RBS staff on Thursday morning by the bank's chief executive Ross McEwan.

Continue reading the main story

“Start Quote

This is a technical procedure regarding the rotation of our registered head office based on our current strategy and business plan. It is not an intention to move operations or jobs”

End Quote Ross McEwan RBS chief executive

Mr Salmond said the letter had stated: "It is my view as chief executive that any decision to move our registered headquarters would have no impact on our everyday banking services used by our customers in Scotland.

"This is a technical procedure regarding the rotation of our registered head office based on our current strategy and business plan. It is not an intention to move operations or jobs".

The bank has been based in Scotland since 1727.

Companies are increasingly setting out their post-referendum contingency plans.

Lloyds Banking Group said it could also shift its legal home to its headquarters, which is already in London.

However, Lloyds said this was just a legal procedure and "there would be no immediate changes or issues".
'Brass plaques'
The statement from Lloyds said: "Lloyds Banking Group has seen an increased level of enquiries from our customers, colleagues and other stakeholders about our plans post the Scottish referendum.

"While the scale of potential change is currently unclear, we have contingency plans in place which include the establishment of new legal entities in England. This is a legal procedure and there would be no immediate changes or issues which could affect our business or our customers.

"There will be a period between the referendum and the implementation of separation, should a Yes vote be successful, that we believe is sufficient to take any necessary action."

Lloyds, in which the UK government has a 25% stake, owns Bank of Scotland and Halifax.

The move of what Lloyds describes as "legal entities" indicates that the banking group is not suggesting there will be a mass relocation of its 16,000 Scottish-based staff. The move would simply mean that the bank would remain protected and regulated by the Bank of England.

Responding to the announcements by RBS and Lloyds, Mr Salmond said: "We know the moves both from Lloyds and the Royal Bank of Scotland will have no impact on operations or jobs. They are about brass plaques.

"These are contingency plans and they make it quite clear in the statements that they make.

"And the way to avoid any uncertainty in the financial markets is for the United Kingdom to say, following the Edinburgh agreement which they signed, that they will sit down reasonably with the Scottish government after people in Scotland vote Yes in the referendum, and discuss these matters in the best interests of Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom."
Commercial presence
Mr Salmond also denied uncertainty in the markets was caused by the Scottish government's stance on a shared currency.

He added: "Any uncertainty we have seen in the financial markets over the last two days is caused by two things. One is the unreasonable posture of the UK government who have refused to discuss this at any stage throughout the last two years.

"And secondly, the remarkable statement from Downing Street on Monday when they were facing stock market moves, where they said they had no contingency plans for Scottish independence."

Elsewhere, John Lewis chairman Sir Charlie Mayfield claimed shoppers in Scotland could face higher prices if the country votes in favour of independence.

Sir Charlie said the retailer had no intention of reducing its commercial presence north of the border, where it has nine shops, a contact centre and employs more than 3,000 people.

But he cautioned that firms were unlikely to continue sharing the burden of higher operating costs in Scotland across all UK customers in the event of the break up of the Union.

He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "From a business perspective there will be economic consequences to a Yes vote, not just in uncertainty but some of the turmoil we are hearing about.

"And it is also the case that it does cost more money to trade in parts of Scotland and therefore those hard costs, in the event of a Yes vote, are more likely to be passed on."

Continue reading the main story

“Start Quote

Lloyds would move its legal home to its head office, which is already in London - and that's unlikely to have much impact on Scottish employment”

End Quote Robert Peston BBC economics editor

But he added: "On the day after the referendum the shops are going to open on time, nothing will change."

Angus Grossart, chairman of merchant bank Noble Grossart, said that people should "not panic" following the decisions made by the two banks. He told the Financial Times that the impact of a Yes vote was "severely overstated".

BBC economics editor Robert Peston said that that if RBS, 81%-owned by the UK government and which owns 11,500 people in Scotland, moved its head office and registered office to London it "would involve some jobs moving south".

However, he said the situation with Lloyds was different: "Lloyds would move its legal home to its head office, which is already in London - and that's unlikely to have much impact on Scottish employment."

A Treasury source told the BBC that it had discussed the plans with RBS.

On Wednesday, insurance and pensions giant Standard Life said it was "planning for new regulated companies in England to which we could transfer parts of our business if there was a need to do so".

Treasury Chief Secretary Danny Alexander told BBC2's Newsnight: "When a company like Standard Life says that it would, unfortunately, sadly, have to relocate its business to London that is not some sort of decision that they make lightly.

"They make it on the basis that they regard that as the best way to protect their customers under the new circumstances.

"When we hear Lloyds and other banks making clear that they would have to do the same, again that is not something that they say lightly. They say it having thought about it, having talked to their board and to the senior people in those companies."

And Mr Grossart, one of the most senior figures in Scotland's financial establishment, said people were "overreacting" to the threats of exodus of firms.

"I think it is getting out of hand," he told the Financial Times. "To hear some of the comments you almost expect people to be predicting a plague of locusts or mice next."  BBC

Luanda vai ter um Metro de superfície

A notícia não é propriamente nova. A foto da maquete que anuncia a grande novidade, estimula a imaginação. Os mais optimistas já visualizam a paisagem futura. Luanda vai ter um metro de superfície. Ou seja, um sistema de transporte de massas eficiente, rápido e isolado. Fantástico!
O projecto, segundo os sites noticiosos, insere-se no Plano Nacional de Desenvolvimento 2012/2017. O Plano vai ainda estabelecer e implementar um programa de reordenamento do sistema de transportes nas outras províncias e inclui a extensão da rede de táxis a todo o país.
Projecto interessante. Simpatizo com ele. A problemática dos transportes, uma das mais arreliantes do país e, particularmente, de Luanda, tem parte da solução esboçada. Engarrafamentos monumentais, esperas desesperantes em paragens apinhadas de gentes, longas caminhadas e todos transtornos em torno da maka dos transportes vão diminuir consideravelmente.
Habituada a noticiários onde o anúncio de grandes projectos se sobrepõe à realidade, muito embora esses também se possam considerar factos, no âmbito do “vai acontecer”, confesso que não prestei muita atenção aos detalhes relativos ao metro de superfície. Tudo por causa do entusiasmo.
Bastarão apenas duas chuvadas, com as conhecidas consequências destruidoras, para refrear a minha simpatia e aguçar a objectividade. Intrigada, procurei na net mais detalhes sobre o projecto divulgado há sensivelmente três meses. A informação é escassa.
Uma rápida reflexão dá lugar a dezenas de perguntas. Quantas pessoas vai servir e que garantias existem para o funcionamento desse meio de transporte numa cidade que é também sinónimo de problemas recorrentes como a falta de energia. Ou vai funcionar a vapor? A pergunta pode parecer absurda, mas não entendo nada de metros, sejam eles de superfície ou subterrâneos.
Em todo caso, indiscutivelmente, o nosso metro de superfície vai contribuir para colmatar deficiências mil. Quando é que isso vai aconteceu é algo que não se sabe porque nem sempre os prazos de execução são cumpridos à risca. Dito de outro modo. Vamos só esperar tranquilamente pelo tão sonhado dia.
Porque a vida é hoje, os verdadeiros metros de superfície de Luanda têm o azul como tom predominante. Tão necessários quanto abominados, quebram todas as regras de trânsito e de civismo. Contribuem para que a circulação rodoviária em Luanda seja esse cenário dantesco de quebrar os nervos de aço.
Os veículos que garantem o transporte de boa parte dos luandenses circulam a pouquíssimos metros de distância das outras viaturas. Provocam, riscam carros alheios, exasperam e colocam em risco a segurança de passageiros e transeuntes. Enriquecem o linguajar angolano com os seus “termos técnicos” como “emagrece” (afasta, dá espaço a mais um passageiro). Mas, ao fim do dia servem vários milhares de pessoas. São eles. Os candongueiros. Aliás, táxis.
Os metros de superfície da actualidade passam por lugares esquecidos desta cidade que se constrói a altos contrastes. As suas rotas incluem buracos “normais” e crateras que são ponto único de passagem para pessoas que, de outro modo, teriam como única forma de locomoção as próprias pernas.
Geralmente vencem percursos intransitáveis para automobilistas comuns. Vários troços desafiam a imaginação. Num deles, em determinado momento, o carro dá a impressão de ter sido engolido pela terra, tão grande é a inclinação. É mesmo só impressão porque alguns segundos depois a parte da frente emerge. Coragem dos passageiros que correm riscos, perícia do motorista, necessidade de apresentar contas certas ao patrão ou tudo isso?
A luta pela sobrevivência é diária. Ninguém a ganha em casa. Enquanto o projecto não sai do papel, a operação tapa buracos poderia mudar o retrato de Luanda. Em tempo de chuvas que transformam as estradas esburacadas em passarelas para a “dança” de carros com prazo de validade precocemente encurtado, o azulinho continua a ser o metro de superfície para os luandenses. Luísa Rogério

Primeiro satélite angolano em 2017

“”(…)  A construção do satélite, avaliada em 37 mil milhões de kwanzas (294 milhões de euros), decorre em Angola, a cargo de um consórcio russo liderado pela RSC. Envolve também um financiamento russo, conforme anunciado em 2013.
O atraso no financiamento do projeto tem vindo a fazer derrapar o lançamento do Angosat, que já esteve previsto para 2015 e depois para 2016.

O executivo angolano prevê, com a entrada em funcionamento deste satélite, que o país possa fornecer serviços de suporte às telecomunicações eletrónicas, incluindo a prestação de banda larga e de televisão.
O Angosat terá um período de vida de 15 anos e 22 ‘transponders’, dispositivos de comunicação eletrónica. Incluirá a construção de duas estações de rastreio, em Angola e na Rússia.

Para o responsável pela pasta das telecomunicações no Governo angolano, Aristides Safeca, o Angosat marca a entrada do país "numa nova era das telecomunicações, o que pressupõe a condução de um programa espacial que inclua, futuramente, o lançamento de satélites subsequentes". “” – FONTE : NOTÍCIAS  AO  MINUTO

Mugabe esteve de visita à China

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L front) holds a welcome ceremony for Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe before their talks in Beijing, China, Aug. 25, 2014. (Xinhua/Ding Lin)

BEIJING, Aug. 25 (Xinhua) -- China and Zimbabwe pledged to strengthen friendship and all-round cooperation as Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe visited Beijing on Monday.
The pledge came out of the talks between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Mugabe in the Great Hall of the People.
Calling Mugabe an old friend of China, a renowned leader of Africa's national liberation movement and promoter of Africa's integration, Xi said the traditional friendship between both countries was forged during the two countries' anti-imperialism, anti-colonialism and anti-hegemony wars.
Since the establishment of diplomatic ties 34 years ago, the two countries understood and supported each other on issues regarding each other's core interests and major concern, and helped one another in their development, Xi said.
He said China will continue to adhere to its principles, uphold justice and support Zimbabwe's efforts to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests.
"We believe the Zimbabwean people have wisdom and capabilities to handle their affairs very well," Xi added.
The Chinese president urged both sides to maintain high-level exchanges, share experience in inter-party exchanges, governance, reform and opening-up.
China will continue to help train Zimbabwean talents, teach and transfer agricultural technologies to Zimbabwe and help the country to increase food production and agricultural income, he said.
Xi also expressed willingness to participate in Zimbabwe's construction of economic and industrial zones, and vowed to encourage more Chinese companies to invest in the country.
As Zimbabwe will hold rotating presidency of the African Union next year, Xi vowed joint efforts with the country to push China-Africa strategic partnership up to a new stage.
Mugabe, who is on a state visit as Xi's guest, expressed appreciation for China's support and help during his country's anti-colonialism war and struggle for national liberation and independence.
He praised China's fairness in global affairs, as well as its respect and help for African countries.
Zimbabwe is committed to speeding up its economic development, said the 90-year-old, expressing his hope to strengthen cooperation with China and boost Africa-China ties.
After their talks, the two presidents witnessed the signing of several cooperation deals in such areas as food, finance and tourism.
Mugabe is visiting China from Aug. 24-28.

O complexo assassínio de Amílcar Cabral

Praia (Lusa, 8 de Setembro de 2014) – O investigador e professor universitário cabo-verdiano Daniel Santos lança sexta-feira, na Cidade da Praia, o livro “Amílcar Cabral – Um Novo Olhar”, defendendo que Sékou Touré, antigo presidente da Guiné-Conacri, terá sido o “provável mandante” do assassinato.
“O livro veio confirmar que os portugueses nada têm a ver com a morte de Amílcar Cabral. Pelos dados que reúnem, tudo se encaminha para que tenha sido Sékou Touré, antigo presidente da Guiné-Conacri, o mais provável mandante do crime”, revelou Daniel dos Santos, indicando que a obra será apresentada pelo antigo ministro das Infraestruturas de Transportes cabo-verdiano, Armindo Ferreira.
Numa entrevista à agência Lusa, o investigador recordou que no dia em que o “pai” das independências da Guiné-Bissau e de Cabo Verde foi assassinado, Sékou Touré preparou um jantar no seu gabinete para os “40 cabecilhas” que estiveram envolvidos na morte de Cabral, a 20 de janeiro de 1973, em Conacri.

Amílcar Cabral e Sékou Touré

“As pessoas já estão identificadas. Só falta oficializar quem mandou matar Amílcar Cabral”, prosseguiu o investigador cabo-verdiano, dizendo que a obra, de 600 páginas e sem prefácio, serve para “reavivar a memória” e fazer uma “rotura” de tudo o que já se escreveu sobre Cabral.
A morte de Cabral nunca foi devidamente esclarecida, havendo dúvidas sobre os mandantes do crime que o vitimou, reinando também o silêncio dos antigos companheiros no Partido Africano de Independência da Guiné e Cabo Verde (PAIGC), cuja sede durante a luta de libertação (1963/74) estava precisamente em Conacri.
Vários livros já deram pistas sobre o contexto que levou à morte de Cabral, como os do jornalista e investigador português José Pedro Castanheira, do historiador guineense Julião Soares Sousa, dos escritores são-tomense Tomás Medeiros e angolano António Tomás, mas todos são inconclusivos sobre um envolvimento de Portugal ou do PAIGC.
Sabe-se apenas que o autor dos disparos que o vitimaram foi Inocêncio Kani, guerrilheiro do PAIGC entretanto falecido, alegadamente a mando de outro alto dirigente do então movimento independentista, Morno Touré, em conluio com Mamadou Ndjai, chefe da guarda de Cabral.
Daniel Santos recordou que o livro lhe ocorreu em 2001, quando começou a pensar em escrever uma dissertação de mestrado, que veio a coincidir com Amílcar Cabral e tinha como título “A Questão Colonial – O Contributo de Amílcar Cabral”.
“Quando fui defender a minha dissertação de mestrado, dei conta que havia a necessidade de se fazer um livro como este, porque todo o debate que se centrou durante a arguição da tese foi sobre a vida de Amílcar Cabral. Houve a necessidade de se aprofundar mais”, indicou, dizendo, porém, que o livro, escrito há dois anos, tem pouco a ver com a dissertação de mestrado.
Segundo Daniel Santos, a obra é diferente de tudo o que já se escreveu sobre Cabral e, em termos de metodologia, faz uma “rotura completa”, uma vez que se afasta do “individualismo metodológico” para se centrar no “pluralismo metodológico”, ou seja, cruza várias fontes, deixando o público tirar as suas próprias conclusões.
Para o investigador, que reivindicou ser o primeiro cabo-verdiano a escrever um livro sobre Amílcar Cabral, a obra servirá também para promover um “debate cívico, franco, pedagógico, académico, muito humilde e sem amarras” sobre Cabral, sem perder de vista o contexto em que viveu e se moveu.

Amílcar Cabral e o seu presumível assassino Cani à direita na Rússia

“Valeu a pena fazer esta caminhada e apresentar aos cabo-verdianos, partidos políticos, investigadores, jornalistas e professores um livro que não foi feito a pensar em agradar a este ou aquele, mas que seja útil a quem o leia”, mostrou.
Para o autor, Amílcar Cabral continua uma “figura marcante e emblemática” na história da Guiné-Bissau e de Cabo Verde, uma pessoa com “defeitos e virtudes”, defendendo ser necessário colocá-lo “no lugar que conquistou por mérito próprio”.
O investigador cabo-verdiano diz que tem “muitas coisas na gaveta” e que já escreveu 90% de outro livro sobre a história das ideias políticas do fundador do Partido Africano para a Independência de Guiné e Cabo Verde (PAIGC).
Daniel dos Santos, 57 anos, nasceu na Cidade da Praia, é jornalista – não está em exercício -, politólogo e professor nas universidades Lusófona de Lisboa, Jean Piaget e Instituto Superior de Ciências Jurídicas e Sociais (ISCJS), as duas últimas em Cabo Verde.